Materiality

Our Materiality Analysis considered international standards such as SASB, GRI, MSCI, TCFD and GRESB, as well as public company reports and recommendations from other industry players, evaluating their impact and relevance for FUNO, before including them in the preliminary list of Sustainability issues.

Our materiality assessment was led by an independent professional consultant and is conducted with periodic reviews as needed to maintain its relevance and accuracy. The process actively engaged external stakeholders in identifying the most significant issues, which were then systematically prioritized using a materiality matrix. This has been seamlessly integrated into the company’s Enterprise Risk Management framework and is used in the risk assessment conducted by the same independent professional consultant. This assessment ensures that sustainability risks and opportunities are managed alongside other operational risks. Grounded in the principle of double materiality, it evaluates both the internal impacts on our business and the external effects on society and the environment. To guarantee full transparency and credibility, the entire assessment process is verified by a third-party provider.

On 2025, this analysis was updated for FUNO's total operations, including office, industrial, retail and the other´s segments. Likewise, we identified fair business practices in an international scale, risk for every issue and the focal points given by the following stakeholders:

cuidar capital humano

Investors

cuidar capital humano

Leaders

cuidar capital humano

Industry & competition

cuidar capital humano

Media

cuidar capital humano

Controllers

cuidar capital humano

Tenants

cuidar capital humano

Public figures

cuidar capital humano

Foundations

As a result, we got the top 10 materiality issues which are explained below:

Top 10 materiality issues analysis

Análisis del top 10 temas materiales

Impact table

Impact Area
Impact Area Material Issue (External) Cause of Impact Output Metric (Annual) Impact Metric Impact Valuation Methodology Annual Monetized Value* External Stakeholders / Impact Areas
Environmental - Water Water management - Sustainable water use and efficiency across properties Property operations, maintenance teams, project development 2.2 million m3 water withdrawn; 35% of assets with water-saving technology 19.3% reduction in water withdrawal vs. baseline; 18% of portfolio in high-water-stress areas Water conserved (m3) x price of water in high-stress areas (USD $1.10/m3) USD $554,400 Tenants, local communities, NGOs, suppliers, ecosystems
Environmental - Energy Energy Management - Energy efficiency and renewable energy adoption Facilities management, sustainability department, project development 157,944,415.9 total energy use; 1% from renewables 78.8% reduction in energy intensity (kWh/m2) vs. baseline; 42,000 tCO2e avoided (a) Energy saved (GWh) x avg. commercial electricity tariff in MX ($0.12/kWh) = direct savings; USD $8.65M Tenants, investors, regulators, local communities