Materiality
Our Materiality Analysis considered international standards such as SASB, GRI, MSCI, TCFD and GRESB, as well as public company reports and recommendations from other industry players, evaluating their impact and relevance for FUNO, before including them in the preliminary list of Sustainability issues.
Our materiality assessment was led by an independent professional consultant and is conducted with periodic reviews as needed to maintain its relevance and accuracy. The process actively engaged external stakeholders in identifying the most significant issues, which were then systematically prioritized using a materiality matrix. This has been seamlessly integrated into the company’s Enterprise Risk Management framework and is used in the risk assessment conducted by the same independent professional consultant. This assessment ensures that sustainability risks and opportunities are managed alongside other operational risks. Grounded in the principle of double materiality, it evaluates both the internal impacts on our business and the external effects on society and the environment. To guarantee full transparency and credibility, the entire assessment process is verified by a third-party provider.
On 2025, this analysis was updated for FUNO's total operations, including office, industrial, retail and the other´s segments. Likewise, we identified fair business practices in an international scale, risk for every issue and the focal points given by the following stakeholders:
Investors
Leaders
Industry & competition
Media
Controllers
Tenants
Public figures
Foundations
As a result, we got the top 10 materiality issues which are explained below:
Top 10 materiality issues analysis
Impact table
| Impact Area | Material Issue (External) | Cause of Impact | Output Metric (Annual) | Impact Metric | Impact Valuation Methodology | Annual Monetized Value* | External Stakeholders / Impact Areas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental - Water | Water management - Sustainable water use and efficiency across properties | Property operations, maintenance teams, project development | 2.2 million m3 water withdrawn; 35% of assets with water-saving technology | 19.3% reduction in water withdrawal vs. baseline; 18% of portfolio in high-water-stress areas | Water conserved (m3) x price of water in high-stress areas (USD $1.10/m3) | USD $554,400 | Tenants, local communities, NGOs, suppliers, ecosystems |
| Environmental - Energy | Energy Management - Energy efficiency and renewable energy adoption | Facilities management, sustainability department, project development | 157,944,415.9 total energy use; 1% from renewables | 78.8% reduction in energy intensity (kWh/m2) vs. baseline; 42,000 tCO2e avoided | (a) Energy saved (GWh) x avg. commercial electricity tariff in MX ($0.12/kWh) = direct savings; | USD $8.65M | Tenants, investors, regulators, local communities |